While on my aforementioned vacation-at-the-beach, I also went to see one movie. And having learned from my aforementioned reading-at-the-beach mistake, we decided to see an easygoing, breezy, sun-drenched, romantic film – in keeping with our vacation. This ruled out The Dark Knight, sadly, and naturally. Instead we watched the new Woody Allen film, Vicky Christina Barcelona, about two American girls (Vicky & Christina, natch) who spend a summer in, you guessed it, Barcelona. The blank, borderline dullness of this title presages my thoughts on the film as a whole: Vicky Christina Barcelona is about Vicky and Christina in Barcelona. Ok. We get it. Anything else? No? Ok. That’s…um…fine, I guess.At any rate, Vicky Christina Barcelona fit the vacation-movie bill, but that’s pretty much the extent of it. It was neither particularly funny (like my favorite Woody Allen: Bullets Over Broadway, nor particularly moving (like another one of my Woody-favs: Sweet and Lowdown). It wasn’t engrossing (Hannah and Her Sisters) or dark (Match Point), or silly (Sleeper), or awful (Celebrity). It was just there (Deconstructing Harry). It felt like a sketch of an idea that refused to blossom into a full idea. The characters were Types, who likewise never blossomed into people. The whole exercise was watchable but also uneven, especially when an intrusive narrator – who had the same unfortunate vocal timbre as a small-market TV sportscaster – would barge in with painful obviousness to describe what everybody was thinking and feeling
(this happened with unfortunate regularity). There were some interesting moments and interesting ideas; everything was beautiful – from the Gaudi buildings to Scarlett Johansson, but ultimately flat and uncompelling.The whole film was set in a world of seemingly unimaginable privilege and wealth. This wealth was made by men (dutiful, boring, unloveable husbands and fiancés), while the seemingly unemployed women rolled around in this golden glory being repressed, complaining about unhappiness, and generally being sexually rapacious. I’m still unpacking the gender/financial politics and implications of all this, but the film didn’t seem to intend all that much by it. It ultimately just made everything feel stilted and somewhat uncomfortable. (Maybe it’s simply best not to dig too deep or apply too much auteur theory to a Woody Allen flick at this point.) And as my wife mentioned as we walked out of the theater, nobody even ended up particularly changed by the events of the film. Everybody ends up in pretty much the same position they were in at the very first moment of the film, and I’m not particularly confident that anybody even learned or gleaned anything from the proceedings I watched for 90 minutes. All in all, it doesn’t add up to much.

Because this bears mentioning: if you have been led to believe that Scarlett Johansson has a hot threesome with Javier Bardem and Penelope Cruz, forget it.
Ultimately, I wasn’t sure if these characters were meant to just be allegories – The Girl Who Thinks With Head vs. The Girl Who Thinks With Heart – and if so, I wonder what the allegorical point of having them achieve nothing in the end means. Or perhaps they were just meekly drawn characters who never really managed to come to life and simply stumbled through a decent but mediocre late-period Woody-Allen-takes-on-Europe movie. Either way: meh.



